Resilience Coaching Collective

Sensory Oasis: Providing Choices, and Designing Calmer Spaces for Neurodivergent People

Maribel C. Stikeleather, M. Ed., BCBA, QBA, LBA

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 58:08

Please note: 

Before we jump in, we want to name our intention: this is a learning conversation grounded in lived experience. We’re not here to judge people or businesses—our goal is to identify what helps, what gets in the way, and how small changes can improve comfort, dignity, and inclusion across the community.

This episode was from a workshop organized by Behavioral Teaching Solutions (BTS) LLC on April 28, 2026, as part of the Autism Awareness Month celebration, with the support of the Patterson Foundation through Remake Learning Days and Art Avenue. We also acknowledge The Princess Poetess, who co-facilitated this workshop.

In this episode, Belle, attendees, and a neurodivergent panel break down what a “sensory oasis” really means—not one-size-fits-all, but a set of individualized environmental variables that reduce overload and increase access. The group translates lived experience into practical design ideas for businesses (especially restaurants): lowering noise and interruptions, offering quieter seating options, reducing “menu overload,” and creating choice-rich sensory supports (e.g., headphones, fidgets, low-light options) without stigma. They also highlight the social side of inclusion—asking for preferences rather than assuming, repairing missteps quickly, and building norms that make self-advocacy safe and expected.

Behavior-analytic link (plain terms you can use on-air)

  • Antecedent strategies: change the setting (sound, light, layout, menus) to prevent overload before it happens.
  • Stimulus control: clear signals like “quiet seating,” “low music,” or “sensory kit available” make it easier for people to contact the environment they need.
  • Choice & assent: more options = less pressure; people can opt in/out without losing access or dignity.
  • Social validity: ask users (customers/staff) what actually helps and then act on it.

Research in Behavior Analysis in Practice

1) Trauma-informed, assent-forward practice 

Rajaraman, Hanley, & colleagues (Behavior Analysis in Practice) — work on trauma-informed/compassionate ABA practice and how to reduce coercion, prioritize client choice, and design contexts that feel safe.


Connection to the episode: Your group repeatedly emphasizes that sensory spaces shouldn’t function like “adult timeout,” and that direct demands/questions can create pressure—this aligns with trauma-informed recommendations: reduce aversives, build safety cues, increase choice, and repair ruptures quickly.

2) Social validity and client-centered outcomes (“individualized” + “ask what people need”)

Wolf, M. M. (1978). “Social validity: The case for subjective measurement…”  emphasizes social validity measurement and stakeholder-informed programming (often in service delivery, training, and treatment evaluation).


Connection to the episode: The panel’s repeated “it’s individualized” and “ask customers/employees and respond” aligns with a social validity approach: measure acceptability, feasibility, and perceived benefit—not just behavior change.

3) Practical functional assessment / function-based prevention ( “modify the environment” + “prevent overload”)

Behavior Analysis in Practice has published practice-oriented work by Hanley and colleagues on function-based, practical assessment and on building skill-based, noncoercive supports.


Connection to the episode: Sensory overload and interruption problems function like establishing operations + aversive antecedents; the group’s recommendations (quiet areas, sound dampening, predictable options) are classic function-based prevention moves—reduce triggers, increase access to coping responses, and reinforce appropriate self-advocacy.

This is 

This episode meets 1CE for QABA or BACB.

Thanks for joining Resilience Coaching Collective!

We explore neurodiversity-affirming, evidence-based strategies inspired by Israel Goldiamond’s constructional approach (expanded by T.V. Joe Layng and rooted in B.F. Skinner’s science) that build strengths and repertoires rather than simply eliminate problem behaviors.

This episode is part of our ongoing inclusion initiative, Spectrum Speaks, a Behavioral Teaching Solutions project dedicated to amplifying neurodivergent voices and creating safe spaces for growth.

If this episode resonated with you, please subscribe to our weekly conversations that turn challenges into lasting capabilities.

Earn Affordable CEUs

Many episodes offer 1 Learning CEU (BACB / QABA-eligible) for just $9.99 USD.

[Purchase here]

(Quiz link and certificate sent via email after payment.)

Connect with us:

www.rccpodcast.com

@belleStike on Instagram | X | Threads

Share feedback or topic ideas: reply anywhere or email belle@maribelcastillo.co

Backlog gems from 2025 + fresh episodes in 2026 — see you next time!

#ResilienceCoachingCollective #ConstructionalApproach #Neurodiversity #ActuallyAutistic #BCBA

...

Podcasts we love

Check out these other fine podcasts recommended by us, not an algorithm.

Resilience Coaching Collective Artwork

Resilience Coaching Collective

Maribel C. Stikeleather, M. Ed., BCBA, QBA, LBA